You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of arm-crank position on the drag of a paralympic hand-cyclist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10255842.2018.1558217 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Mannion, Yasin Toparlar, Eoghan Clifford, Magdalena Hajdukiewicz, Thomas Andrianne, Bert Blocken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 27% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,739,035
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
#199
of 1,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,588
of 366,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.