| Title |
Defining invasiveness and invasibility in ecological networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-016-1076-7 |
| Authors |
Cang Hui, David M. Richardson, Pietro Landi, Henintsoa O. Minoarivelo, Jeff Garnas, Helen E. Roy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 310 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 21% |
| Researcher | 53 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 140 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 87 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 69 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#1,827,904
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#248
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,764
of 312,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#8
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.