↓ Skip to main content

Examining the independent and joint effects of molecular genetic liability and environmental exposures in schizophrenia: results from the EUGEI study

Overview of attention for article published in World Psychiatry, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining the independent and joint effects of molecular genetic liability and environmental exposures in schizophrenia: results from the EUGEI study
Published in
World Psychiatry, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/wps.20629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinan Guloksuz, Lotta‐Katrin Pries, Philippe Delespaul, Gunter Kenis, Jurjen J. Luykx, Bochao D. Lin, Alexander L. Richards, Berna Akdede, Tolga Binbay, Vesile Altınyazar, Berna Yalınçetin, Güvem Gümüş‐Akay, Burçin Cihan, Haldun Soygür, Halis Ulaş, EylemŞahin Cankurtaran, Semra Ulusoy Kaymak, Marina M. Mihaljevic, Sanja Andric Petrovic, Tijana Mirjanic, Miguel Bernardo, Bibiana Cabrera, Julio Bobes, Pilar A. Saiz, María Paz García‐Portilla, Julio Sanjuan, Eduardo J. Aguilar, José Luis Santos, Estela Jiménez‐López, Manuel Arrojo, Angel Carracedo, Gonzalo López, Javier González‐Peñas, Mara Parellada, Nadja P. Maric, Cem Atbaşog˘lu, Alp Ucok, Köksal Alptekin, Meram Can Saka, Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis investigators, Celso Arango, Michael O'Donovan, Bart P.F. Rutten, Jim van Os

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 81 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 17%
Psychology 29 13%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 96 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,135,876
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from World Psychiatry
#244
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,417
of 356,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Psychiatry
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.