Title |
RECENT TRENDS IN UTILIZATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING AND INVASIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE LARGE SCALE UNITED STATES MILITARY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0735-1097(18)32178-8 |
Authors |
Charles Eisenberg, Zorana Mrsic, Geoffrey Cole, Amber M. Evans, Cynthia Philip, Todd Villines |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#515,990
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,307
of 16,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,915
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#50
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.