↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: RETRACTED ARTICLE: Application of extreme learning machine for estimation of wind speed distribution

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: RETRACTED ARTICLE: Application of extreme learning machine for estimation of wind speed distribution
Published in
Climate Dynamics, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00382-015-2730-y
Authors

Shahaboddin Shamshirband, Kasra Mohammadi, Chong Wen Tong, Dalibor Petković, Emilio Porcu, Ali Mostafaeipour, Sudheer Ch, Ahmad Sedaghat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 15%
Engineering 2 15%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,443,697
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#3,217
of 4,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,895
of 262,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#50
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.