↓ Skip to main content

Writing Systematic Reviews of the Literature—It Really Is a Systematic Process!

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Digital Imaging, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Writing Systematic Reviews of the Literature—It Really Is a Systematic Process!
Published in
Journal of Digital Imaging, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10278-018-00176-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Krupinski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Unspecified 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Unspecified 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,019,126
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#821
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,775
of 437,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.