↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the utility of TDP-43 immunoreactive (TDP-43-ir) pathology to classify FTLD-TDP subtypes

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Revisiting the utility of TDP-43 immunoreactive (TDP-43-ir) pathology to classify FTLD-TDP subtypes
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00401-019-02024-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasushi Nishihira, Tamar Gefen, Qinwen Mao, Christina Appin, Missia Kohler, Jamie Walker, Rosa Rademakers, Alfred Rademaker, Emily Rogalski, Sandra Weintraub, Changiz Geula, M-Marsel Mesulam, Eileen H. Bigio

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#947
of 2,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,623
of 367,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#25
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.