| Title |
Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benedek Kurdi, Shayn Lozano, Mahzarin R. Banaji |
| Abstract |
We introduce the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS), an open-access online stimulus set containing 900 color images depicting a broad spectrum of themes, including humans, animals, objects, and scenes, along with normative ratings on two affective dimensions-valence (i.e., the degree of positive or negative affective response that the image evokes) and arousal (i.e., the intensity of the affective response that the image evokes). The OASIS images were collected from online sources, and valence and arousal ratings were obtained in an online study (total N = 822). The valence and arousal ratings covered much of the circumplex space and were highly reliable and consistent across gender groups. OASIS has four advantages: (a) the stimulus set contains a large number of images in four categories; (b) the data were collected in 2015, and thus OASIS features more current images and reflects more current ratings of valence and arousal than do existing stimulus sets; (c) the OASIS database affords users the ability to interactively explore images by category and ratings; and, most critically, (d) OASIS allows for free use of the images in online and offline research studies, as they are not subject to the copyright restrictions that apply to the International Affective Picture System. The OASIS images, along with normative valence and arousal ratings, are available for download from www.benedekkurdi.com/#oasis or https://db.tt/yYTZYCga . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 31 | 29% |
| United States | 8 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 79% |
| Scientists | 15 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 617 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 87 | 14% |
| Researcher | 69 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 94 | 15% |
| Unknown | 143 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 228 | 36% |
| Neuroscience | 64 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 37 | 6% |
| Engineering | 27 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 77 | 12% |
| Unknown | 179 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#562,608
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#31
of 2,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,704
of 314,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.