↓ Skip to main content

Codon Usage Bias Analysis of Citrus tristeza Virus: Higher Codon Adaptation to Citrus reticulata Host

Overview of attention for article published in Viruses, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Codon Usage Bias Analysis of Citrus tristeza Virus: Higher Codon Adaptation to Citrus reticulata Host
Published in
Viruses, April 2019
DOI 10.3390/v11040331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kajal Kumar Biswas, Supratik Palchoudhury, Prosenjit Chakraborty, Utpal K. Bhattacharyya, Dilip K. Ghosh, Palash Debnath, Chandrika Ramadugu, Manjunath L. Keremane, Ravi K. Khetarpal, Richard F. Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,681,024
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Viruses
#6,732
of 8,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,049
of 352,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Viruses
#212
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.