You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Assessment of the Deep Cervical Flexor Muscles: The Craniocervical Flexion Test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gwendolen A. Jull, Shaun P. O'Leary, Deborah L. Falla |
| Abstract |
The craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) is a clinical test of the anatomical action of the deep cervical flexor muscles, the longus capitis, and colli. It has evolved over 15 years as both a clinical and research tool and was devised in response to research indicating the importance of the deep cervical flexors in support of the cervical lordosis and motion segments and clinical observations of their impairment with neck pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,075 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1047 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 283 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 146 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 86 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 6% |
| Other | 221 | 21% |
| Unknown | 201 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 422 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 246 | 23% |
| Sports and Recreations | 57 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 24 | 2% |
| Other | 76 | 7% |
| Unknown | 226 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,896,932
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#518
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,366
of 95,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.