You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theresita Joseph, Stephen D. Auger, Luisa Peress, Daniel Rack, Jack Cuzick, Gavin Giovannoni, Andrew Lees, Anette E. Schrag, Alastair J. Noyce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,958,618
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#2,942
of 4,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,166
of 349,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#60
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.