↓ Skip to main content

Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
42 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
7 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
338 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests
Published in
Science, February 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aad5068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Wu, Loren P Albert, Aline P Lopes, Natalia Restrepo-Coupe, Matthew Hayek, Kenia T Wiedemann, Kaiyu Guan, Scott C Stark, Bradley Christoffersen, Neill Prohaska, Julia V Tavares, Suelen Marostica, Hideki Kobayashi, Mauricio L Ferreira, Kleber Silva Campos, Rodrigo da Silva, Paulo M Brando, Dennis G Dye, Travis E Huxman, Alfredo R Huete, Bruce W Nelson, Scott R Saleska

Abstract

In evergreen tropical forests, the extent, magnitude, and controls on photosynthetic seasonality are poorly resolved and inadequately represented in Earth system models. Combining camera observations with ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes at forests across rainfall gradients in Amazônia, we show that aggregate canopy phenology, not seasonality of climate drivers, is the primary cause of photosynthetic seasonality in these forests. Specifically, synchronization of new leaf growth with dry season litterfall shifts canopy composition toward younger, more light-use efficient leaves, explaining large seasonal increases (~27%) in ecosystem photosynthesis. Coordinated leaf development and demography thus reconcile seemingly disparate observations at different scales and indicate that accounting for leaf-level phenology is critical for accurately simulating ecosystem-scale responses to climate change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 1%
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 463 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 22%
Researcher 94 20%
Student > Master 59 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 4%
Other 69 14%
Unknown 86 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 128 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 108 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 82 17%
Engineering 10 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 <1%
Other 21 4%
Unknown 124 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#366,360
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#9,493
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,327
of 314,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#165
of 1,169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.