↓ Skip to main content

Microneedle technology for immunisation: Perception, acceptability and suitability for paediatric use

Overview of attention for article published in Vaccine, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microneedle technology for immunisation: Perception, acceptability and suitability for paediatric use
Published in
Vaccine, December 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Marshall, Laura J. Sahm, Anne C. Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Materials Science 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,269,042
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#7,986
of 16,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,279
of 385,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#75
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.