| Title |
“Always read the small print”: a case study of commercial research funding, disclosure and agreements with Coca-Cola
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Health Policy, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1057/s41271-019-00170-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Steele, Gary Ruskin, Martin McKee, David Stuckler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 474 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 6% |
| Spain | 28 | 6% |
| Canada | 24 | 5% |
| Argentina | 16 | 3% |
| France | 11 | 2% |
| India | 11 | 2% |
| Mexico | 10 | 2% |
| Chile | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 71 | 15% |
| Unknown | 212 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 361 | 76% |
| Scientists | 62 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 26% |
| Unknown | 35 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 870. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,887
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#1
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#403
of 365,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them