Title |
Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Orthopaedics, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00264-010-1198-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Luis Pulido, Sridhar R. Rachala, Miguel E. Cabanela |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 106 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 13% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 27 | 24% |
Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 51% |
Engineering | 10 | 9% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,184,793
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#155
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,740
of 181,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.