↓ Skip to main content

Integrated modeling predicts shifts in waterbird population dynamics under climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated modeling predicts shifts in waterbird population dynamics under climate change
Published in
Ecography, May 2019
DOI 10.1111/ecog.04548
Authors

Qing Zhao, G. Scott Boomer, J. Andrew Royle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 38%
Environmental Science 16 21%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,373,673
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#710
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,829
of 357,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.