You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wearable technologies and stigma in diabetes: the role of medical aesthetics
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/s2213-8587(16)00075-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Conor Farrington |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 50% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 58% |
Scientists | 6 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Design | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,208,773
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#1,052
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,169
of 313,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
#23
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.