↓ Skip to main content

The neural correlates of happiness: A review of PET and fMRI studies using autobiographical recall methods

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
The neural correlates of happiness: A review of PET and fMRI studies using autobiographical recall methods
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, February 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13415-016-0414-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angelo Suardi, Igor Sotgiu, Tommaso Costa, Franco Cauda, Maria Rusconi

Abstract

Although very difficult to define, happiness is becoming a core concept within contemporary psychology and affective neuroscience. In the last two decades, the increased use of neuroimaging techniques has facilitated empirical study of the neural correlates of happiness. This area of research utilizes procedures that induce positive emotion and mood, and autobiographical recall is one of the most widely used and effective approaches. In this article, we review eight positron emission tomography and seven functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that have investigated happiness by using autobiographical recall to induce emotion. Regardless of the neuroimaging technique used, the studies conducted so far have shown that remembering happy events is primarily associated with the activation of many areas, including anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, and insula. Importantly, these areas are also found to be connected with other basic emotions, such as sadness and anger. In the conclusion, we integrate these findings, discussing important limitations of the extant literature and suggesting new research directions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 38%
Neuroscience 16 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,748,034
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#129
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,019
of 302,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.