↓ Skip to main content

Fascism and Populism: Are They Useful Categories for Comparative Sociological Analysis?

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Sociology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fascism and Populism: Are They Useful Categories for Comparative Sociological Analysis?
Published in
Annual Review of Sociology, May 2019
DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022351
Authors

Mabel Berezin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 6 7%
Lecturer 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 34 39%
Arts and Humanities 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,857,585
of 25,516,314 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Sociology
#226
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,423
of 363,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Sociology
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,516,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.