You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zika virus infection during pregnancy: what, where, and why?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp16x683917 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachael M Burke, Pranav Pandya, Eleni Nastouli, Philip Gothard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,055,075
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,010
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,992
of 298,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#40
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.