↓ Skip to main content

The response of phimosis to local steroid application

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, May 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
The response of phimosis to local steroid application
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, May 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00173357
Authors

C. S. Kikiros, S. W. Beasley, A. A. Woodward

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Philosophy 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,475,259
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#218
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,889
of 20,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them