| Title |
Development of a novel automated analytical method for viability assessment of phytoplankton used for validation of ballast water treatment systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-019-01817-6 |
| Authors |
Kim Lundgreen, Lisa Eckford-Soper, Knud Ladegaard Pedersen, Henrik Holbech |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,410,854
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#819
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,660
of 350,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.