↓ Skip to main content

Latent class analysis variable selection

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Latent class analysis variable selection
Published in
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10463-009-0258-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nema Dean, Adrian E. Raftery

Abstract

We propose a method for selecting variables in latent class analysis, which is the most common model-based clustering method for discrete data. The method assesses a variable's usefulness for clustering by comparing two models, given the clustering variables already selected. In one model the variable contributes information about cluster allocation beyond that contained in the already selected variables, and in the other model it does not. A headlong search algorithm is used to explore the model space and select clustering variables. In simulated datasets we found that the method selected the correct clustering variables, and also led to improvements in classification performance and in accuracy of the choice of the number of classes. In two real datasets, our method discovered the same group structure with fewer variables. In a dataset from the International HapMap Project consisting of 639 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 210 members of different groups, our method discovered the same group structure with a much smaller number of SNPs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 5 3%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 136 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 26%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 17%
Psychology 19 13%
Mathematics 18 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Other 42 28%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,947,444
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#60
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,146
of 110,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.