↓ Skip to main content

Bad bootstrapping: the problem with third-factor replies to the Darwinian Dilemma for moral realism

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Bad bootstrapping: the problem with third-factor replies to the Darwinian Dilemma for moral realism
Published in
Philosophical Studies, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11098-019-01301-4
Authors

Michelle M. Dyke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 43%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 57%
Computer Science 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,019,126
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#879
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,146
of 350,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.