↓ Skip to main content

Cultivar selection prior to introduction may increase invasiveness: evidence from Ardisia crenata

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Cultivar selection prior to introduction may increase invasiveness: evidence from Ardisia crenata
Published in
Biological Invasions, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10530-005-5839-9
Authors

Kaoru Kitajima, Alison M. Fox, Tamotsu Sato, Dai Nagamatsu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
New Zealand 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 63%
Environmental Science 14 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,741,336
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#700
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,119
of 91,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.