↓ Skip to main content

Market Failures and Government Failures: A Theoretical Model of the Common Agricultural Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Market Failures and Government Failures: A Theoretical Model of the Common Agricultural Policy
Published in
Public Choice, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11127-005-9000-1
Authors

Peter Nedergaard

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 31%
Social Sciences 12 22%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,475,259
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#520
of 1,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,114
of 66,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.