Title |
Market Failures and Government Failures: A Theoretical Model of the Common Agricultural Policy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Public Choice, May 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11127-005-9000-1 |
Authors |
Peter Nedergaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 22% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,475,259
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#520
of 1,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,114
of 66,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.