Title |
Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen Ruben Husby, Michael Due Larsen, Gunnar Lose, Niels Klarskov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
United States | 2 | 20% |
Sweden | 1 | 10% |
Brazil | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 5 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,267,760
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#552
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,171
of 362,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#8
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.