Title |
Effects of cooking methods and temperatures on nutritional and quality characteristics of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicholus)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Food Science and Technology, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13197-011-0551-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Harun Uran, Nalan Gokoglu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 25% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Researcher | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 30 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 29% |
Chemistry | 10 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 11% |
Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#781,693
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#33
of 1,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,156
of 137,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food Science and Technology
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.