↓ Skip to main content

A critique of claims for negative impacts of Marine Protected Areas on fisheries

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
75 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A critique of claims for negative impacts of Marine Protected Areas on fisheries
Published in
Ecological Applications, May 2016
DOI 10.1890/15-0457
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. P. Hughes, D. S. Cameron, A. Chin, S. R. Connolly, J. C. Day, G. P. Jones, L. McCook, P. McGinnity, P. J. Mumby, R. J. Pears, R. L. Pressey, G. R. Russ, J. Tanzer, A. Tobin, M. A. L. Young

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Jersey 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 5 7%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 37%
Environmental Science 25 33%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Mathematics 1 1%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#509,325
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#105
of 3,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,850
of 349,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#6
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.