↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Failure Is Not an Option Optimizing Care for Heart Failure Patients at the End of Life ∗

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Failure Is Not an Option Optimizing Care for Heart Failure Patients at the End of Life ∗
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, May 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.02.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haider J Warraich, Clyde W Yancy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,193,865
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#880
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,785
of 364,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.