↓ Skip to main content

Medication errors in anesthetic practice: a survey of 687 practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Medication errors in anesthetic practice: a survey of 687 practitioners
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf03019726
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beverley A. Orser, Robert J. B. Chen, Doreen A. Yee

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine: 1) if anesthesiologists had experienced a medication error and 2) to identify causal factors. The perceived value of a Canadian reporting agency for medication errors and improved standards for labels on drug ampoules was also investigated. A self-reporting survey was mailed to members of the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (n = 2,266). Respondents provided free-text descriptions of medication errors and answered fixed response questions. Surveys from 687 anesthesiologists (30% response rate) revealed that 85% of the participants had experienced at least one drug error or "near miss". Although most errors (1,038) were of minor consequence (98%), four deaths were reported. The commonest error involved the administration of muscle relaxants instead of a reversal agent. "Syringe swaps" (70.4%) and the misidentification of the label (46.8%) were common contributing factors. Anesthesiologists (97.9%) reported that they read the ampoule label "most of the time" although the label colour was an important secondary cue. Approximately half of the participants would report the error if a reporting program existed and 84% agreed that improved standards for drug labels would reduce the incidence of error. Most anesthesiologists experienced at least one drug error. The commonest error was a "syringe swap" that involved a muscle relaxant. Most errors were of minor consequence, however, serious morbidity and mortality resulted from clearly preventable events. These results support the development of improved standards for drug labels and the establishment of a Canadian reporting program for medication errors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 43%
Engineering 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,233,120
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#668
of 2,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,468
of 113,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them