↓ Skip to main content

From hazard to impact: flood damage assessment tools for mega cities

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
From hazard to impact: flood damage assessment tools for mega cities
Published in
Natural Hazards, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2223-2
Authors

Albert S. Chen, Michael J. Hammond, Slobodan Djordjević, David Butler, David M. Khan, William Veerbeek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 26%
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 54 35%
Environmental Science 23 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 50 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,767,344
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,189
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,249
of 298,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.