↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing Self‐Determination in Health: Results of an RCT of the Ask Project, a School‐Based Intervention for Adolescents with Intellectual Disability

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing Self‐Determination in Health: Results of an RCT of the Ask Project, a School‐Based Intervention for Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
Published in
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/jar.12247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyn McPherson, Robert S. Ware, Suzanne Carrington, Nicholas Lennox

Abstract

Adolescents with intellectual disability have high levels of unrecognized disease and inadequate health screening/promotion which might be addressed by improving health advocacy skills. A parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted to investigate whether a health intervention package, consisting of classroom-based health education, a hand-held health record and a health check, increased carer-reported health advocacy in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Carers of 388 adolescents responded. Adolescents allocated to receive the health intervention package were significantly more likely to go to the doctor on their own, ask questions and explain their health problems to the doctor without help. Carers reported their adolescent had benefited, gaining increased knowledge and responsibility for their own health. They themselves reported an increase in knowledge and better ability to support the young person. An educational initiative based on the Ask Health Diary led to improved healthcare autonomy for adolescents with intellectual disabilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 27 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 18%
Psychology 11 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,686,424
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
#1,062
of 1,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,679
of 410,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.