↓ Skip to main content

What Works Best, a Cemented or Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?: Minimum 17‐year Followup of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
What Works Best, a Cemented or Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?: Minimum 17‐year Followup of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11999-010-1459-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristoff Corten, Robert B. Bourne, Kory D. Charron, Keegan Au, Cecil H. Rorabeck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 48%
Engineering 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 31 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#663
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,097
of 104,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.