| Title |
A self-referential default brain state: patterns of coherence, power, and eLORETA sources during eyes-closed rest and Transcendental Meditation practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Processing, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10339-009-0343-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fred Travis, David A. F. Haaga, John Hagelin, Melissa Tanner, Alaric Arenander, Sanford Nidich, Carolyn Gaylord-King, Sarina Grosswald, Maxwell Rainforth, Robert H. Schneider |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 17% |
| Researcher | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 25% |
| Unknown | 42 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 93 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 44 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 8% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 14% |
| Unknown | 57 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,218,276
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#21
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,424
of 95,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them