↓ Skip to main content

Lifestyles of cancer survivors attending an inpatient educational program—a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Lifestyles of cancer survivors attending an inpatient educational program—a cross-sectional study
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00520-015-2936-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunhild M. Gjerset, Jon H. Loge, Sævar B. Gudbergsson, Asta Bye, S. D. Fosså, Line M. Oldervoll, Cecilie E. Kiserud, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Lene Thorsen

Abstract

Cancer survivors have increased risk for adverse health effects, but the risk can be reduced by adopting a healthy lifestyle. Knowledge of lifestyle in terms of physical activity (PA), diet (intake of fruit and vegetables [F&V]) and smoking behaviors of cancer survivors enrolled in an inpatient educational program and identification of subgroups not meeting the lifestyle guidelines are needed to set up more targeted programs. We invited 862 cancer survivors, ≥18 years, diagnosed within the last 10 years and about to attend a 1-week educational program, to participate in this cross-sectional study. Sixty-seven percent (n = 576) returned the questionnaire before the start of the program. PA, F&V intake (5-A-Day) and smoking behaviors were self-reported. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify the characteristics of those not meeting the guidelines. Sixty-three percent were women, median age was 60 years (range 28-83), 52 % had high education and median time since diagnosis was 12 months (range 2-119). Fifty-five percent did not meet the PA guidelines, 81 % did not meet the 5-A-Day guidelines and 12 % were current smokers. In multivariate analyses, age ≥60 years and low education were associated with not meeting the PA guidelines, and male gender and low education were associated with not meeting the 5-A-Day guidelines. Living alone was associated with smoking. The majority of cancer survivors attending an educational program do not meet the public guidelines for PA and diet. Special attention should be given to those who are male, over age 60 years and with low education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 24%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Psychology 7 17%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,511,186
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#3,995
of 5,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,282
of 274,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#67
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.