You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environmental and genetic determinants of innovativeness in a natural population of birds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2015.0184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John L. Quinn, Ella F. Cole, Thomas E. Reed, Julie Morand-Ferron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Finland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 61% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,459,565
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,757
of 7,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,300
of 318,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#58
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.