↓ Skip to main content

A global role for KLF1 in erythropoiesis revealed by ChIP-seq in primary erythroid cells

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A global role for KLF1 in erythropoiesis revealed by ChIP-seq in primary erythroid cells
Published in
Genome Research, May 2010
DOI 10.1101/gr.106575.110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R. Tallack, Tom Whitington, Wai Shan Yuen, Elanor N. Wainwright, Janelle R. Keys, Brooke B. Gardiner, Ehsan Nourbakhsh, Nicole Cloonan, Sean M. Grimmond, Timothy L. Bailey, Andrew C. Perkins

Abstract

KLF1 regulates a diverse suite of genes to direct erythroid cell differentiation from bipotent progenitors. To determine the local cis-regulatory contexts and transcription factor networks in which KLF1 operates, we performed KLF1 ChIP-seq in the mouse. We found at least 945 sites in the genome of E14.5 fetal liver erythroid cells which are occupied by endogenous KLF1. Many of these recovered sites reside in erythroid gene promoters such as Hbb-b1, but the majority are distant to any known gene. Our data suggests KLF1 directly regulates most aspects of terminal erythroid differentiation including production of alpha- and beta-globin protein chains, heme biosynthesis, coordination of proliferation and anti-apoptotic pathways, and construction of the red cell membrane and cytoskeleton by functioning primarily as a transcriptional activator. Additionally, we suggest new mechanisms for KLF1 cooperation with other transcription factors, in particular the erythroid transcription factor GATA1, to maintain homeostasis in the erythroid compartment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 168 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 26%
Researcher 41 22%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 15 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 22 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#4,259
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,109
of 105,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#32
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.