| Title |
Cats match voice and face: cross-modal representation of humans in cats (Felis catus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-019-01265-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saho Takagi, Minori Arahori, Hitomi Chijiiwa, Atsuko Saito, Hika Kuroshima, Kazuo Fujita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 12% |
| Japan | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 81% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 22% |
| Psychology | 8 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#980,752
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#228
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,717
of 365,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.