You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using citizen‐collected wildlife sightings to predict traffic strike hot spots for threatened species: a case study on the southern cassowary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12635 |
| Authors |
Ross G. Dwyer, Luke Carpenter‐Bundhoo, Craig E. Franklin, Hamish A. Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 71% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,623,249
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,015
of 4,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,666
of 313,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#30
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.