| Title |
Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trees, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00468-006-0119-6 |
| Authors |
Nicholas C. Coops, Thomas Hilker, Michael A. Wulder, Benoît St-Onge, Glenn Newnham, Anders Siggins, J. A. (Tony) Trofymow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 18% |
| Researcher | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 120 | 38% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 50 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 15% |
| Engineering | 14 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 71 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Trees
#470
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,251
of 177,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trees
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.