| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgery Today, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00595-008-3853-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akihiro Cho, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Matsuo Nagata, Nobuhiro Takiguchi, Hideaki Shimada, Osamu Kainuma, Hiroaki Souda, Hisashi Gunji, Akinari Miyazaki, Atsushi Ikeda, Tomoko Tohma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 28% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 56% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#5,879,527
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Surgery Today
#80
of 992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,179
of 93,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery Today
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 992 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them