↓ Skip to main content

Fractal Fluctuations in Human Walking: Comparison Between Auditory and Visually Guided Stepping

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Fractal Fluctuations in Human Walking: Comparison Between Auditory and Visually Guided Stepping
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10439-016-1573-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Terrier

Abstract

In human locomotion, sensorimotor synchronization of gait consists of the coordination of stepping with rhythmic auditory cues (auditory cueing, AC). AC changes the long-range correlations among consecutive strides (fractal dynamics) into anti-correlations. Visual cueing (VC) is the alignment of step lengths with marks on the floor. The effects of VC on the fluctuation structure of walking have not been investigated. Therefore, the objective was to compare the effects of AC and VC on the fluctuation pattern of basic spatiotemporal gait parameters. Thirty-six healthy individuals walked 3 × 500 strides on an instrumented treadmill with augmented reality capabilities. The conditions were no cueing (NC), AC, and VC. AC included an isochronous metronome. For VC, projected stepping stones were synchronized with the treadmill speed. Detrended fluctuation analysis assessed the correlation structure. The coefficient of variation (CV) was also assessed. The results showed that AC and VC similarly induced a strong anti-correlated pattern in the gait parameters. The CVs were similar between the NC and AC conditions but substantially higher in the VC condition. AC and VC probably mobilize similar motor control pathways and can be used alternatively in gait rehabilitation. However, the increased gait variability induced by VC should be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 98 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 14 14%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 13%
Engineering 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Psychology 7 7%
Computer Science 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 34 34%