| Title |
Geochemical appraisal of fluoride contamination of groundwater in the Nayagarh District of Orissa, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Geology, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002540100414 |
| Authors |
N. Kundu, M. Panigrahi, S. Tripathy, S. Munshi, M. Powell, B. Hart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 26% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 17% |
| Engineering | 13 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,855,826
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#26
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,051
of 125,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.