↓ Skip to main content

Gut bacterial communities across tadpole ecomorphs in two diverse tropical anuran faunas

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Gut bacterial communities across tadpole ecomorphs in two diverse tropical anuran faunas
Published in
The Science of Nature, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00114-016-1348-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Vences, Mariana L. Lyra, Jordan G. Kueneman, Molly C. Bletz, Holly M. Archer, Julia Canitz, Svenja Handreck, Roger-Daniel Randrianiaina, Ulrich Struck, Sabin Bhuju, Michael Jarek, Robert Geffers, Valerie J. McKenzie, Christoph C. Tebbe, Célio F. B. Haddad, Julian Glos

Abstract

Animal-associated microbial communities can play major roles in the physiology, development, ecology, and evolution of their hosts, but the study of their diversity has yet focused on a limited number of host species. In this study, we used high-throughput sequencing of partial sequences of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene to assess the diversity of the gut-inhabiting bacterial communities of 212 specimens of tropical anuran amphibians from Brazil and Madagascar. The core gut-associated bacterial communities among tadpoles from two different continents strongly overlapped, with eight highly represented operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in common. In contrast, the core communities of adults and tadpoles from Brazil were less similar with only one shared OTU. This suggests a community turnover at metamorphosis. Bacterial diversity was higher in tadpoles compared to adults. Distinct differences in composition and diversity occurred among gut bacterial communities of conspecific tadpoles from different water bodies and after experimental fasting for 8 days, demonstrating the influence of both environmental factors and food on the community structure. Communities from syntopic tadpoles clustered by host species both in Madagascar and Brazil, and the Malagasy tadpoles also had species-specific isotope signatures. We recommend future studies to analyze the turnover of anuran gut bacterial communities at metamorphosis, compare the tadpole core communities with those of other aquatic organisms, and assess the possible function of the gut microbiota as a reservoir for protective bacteria on the amphibian skin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 28%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,365,753
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#424
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,680
of 299,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.