↓ Skip to main content

A direct comparison of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with clinical routine testing immunoassay methods for the detection and quantification of thyroid hormones in blood serum

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
A direct comparison of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with clinical routine testing immunoassay methods for the detection and quantification of thyroid hormones in blood serum
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00216-019-01724-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha L. Bowerbank, Michelle G. Carlin, John R. Dean

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 26 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 24 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,005,340
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,869
of 9,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,049
of 364,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#34
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,651 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.