| Title |
Interaction of Biological Stress Recovery and Cognitive Vulnerability for Depression in Adolescence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10964-016-0451-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin G. Shapero, George McClung, Debra A. Bangasser, Lyn Y. Abramson, Lauren B. Alloy |
| Abstract |
Major Depressive Disorder is a common mental illness with rates increasing during adolescence. This has led researchers to examine developmental antecedents of depression. This study examined the association between depressive symptoms and the interaction between two empirically supported risk factors for depression: poor recovery of the biological stress system as measured through heart rate and cortisol, and cognitive vulnerabilities as indexed by rumination and a negative cognitive style. Adolescents (n = 127; 49 % female) completed questionnaires and a social stress task to elicit a stress response measured with neuroendocrine (cortisol) and autonomic nervous system (heart rate) endpoints. The findings indicated that higher depressive symptoms were associated with the combination of higher cognitive vulnerabilities and lower cortisol and heart rate recovery. These findings can enhance our understanding of stress responses, lead to personalized treatment, and provide a nuanced understanding of depression in adolescence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,756,367
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#1,549
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,542
of 301,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#24
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.