| Title |
A mixed-methods study of organ donation in the intensive care unit: 22 actionable practices to improve organ donation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-019-01332-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon J. W. Oczkowski, Emmy Arnold, John Centofanti, Pamela Durepos, Aimee Sarti, Erika Arseneau, Sonny Dhanani, Deborah J. Cook, Maureen O. Meade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 22% |
| Sweden | 2 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,734,479
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#433
of 2,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,507
of 367,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#34
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.