| Title |
Phylogeographic patterns of steppe species in Eastern Central Europe: a review and the implications for conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1065-2 |
| Authors |
Łukasz Kajtoch, Elżbieta Cieślak, Zoltán Varga, Wojciech Paul, Miłosz A. Mazur, Gábor Sramkó, Daniel Kubisz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,660,617
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,096
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,938
of 301,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.