↓ Skip to main content

Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
Title
Cannulation strategies for percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00392-015-0941-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Christian Napp, Christian Kühn, Marius M. Hoeper, Jens Vogel-Claussen, Axel Haverich, Andreas Schäfer, Johann Bauersachs

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has revolutionized treatment of severe isolated or combined failure of lung and heart. Due to remarkable technical development the frequency of use is growing fast, with increasing adoption by interventional cardiologists independent of cardiac surgery. Nevertheless, ECMO support harbors substantial risk such as bleeding, thromboembolic events and infection. Percutaneous ECMO circuits usually comprise cannulation of two large vessels ('dual' cannulation), either veno-venous for respiratory and veno-arterial for circulatory support. Recently experienced centers apply more advanced strategies by cannulation of three large vessels ('triple' cannulation), resulting in veno-veno-arterial or veno-arterio-venous cannulation. While the former intends to improve drainage and unloading, the latter represents a very potent method to provide circulatory and respiratory support at the same time. As such triple cannulation expands the field of application at the expense of increased complexity of ECMO systems. Here, we review percutaneous dual and triple cannulation strategies for different clinical scenarios of the critically ill. As there is no unifying terminology to date, we propose a nomenclature which uses "A" and all following letters for supplying cannulas and all letters before "A" for draining cannulas. This general and unequivocal code covers both dual and triple ECMO cannulation strategies (VV, VA, VVA, VAV). Notwithstanding the technical evolution, current knowledge of ECMO support is mainly based on observational experience and mostly retrospective studies. Prospective controlled trials are urgently needed to generate evidence on safety and efficacy of ECMO support in different clinical settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 31 14%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 57 25%
Unknown 51 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Engineering 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 61 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,710,384
of 23,973,980 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#54
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,667
of 393,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,973,980 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.